Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://repositorio.ugto.mx/handle/20.500.12059/1912
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.rights.license | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 | es_MX |
dc.creator | Américo José Hossne García | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-05-22T15:29:45Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-05-22T15:29:45Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013-09-03 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorio.ugto.mx/handle/20.500.12059/1912 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Es común la obtención de muestras de suelos agrícolas mediante el equipo Uhland. El índice crítico de compactación del suelo se establece con la prueba Proctor. El objetivo fue la comparación física del muestreador Uhland, con caída libre y forzada del martillo, con el aparato Proctor para valorar la alteración mecánica de la muestra. Se utilizaron los Proctor estándar y modificado, el Uhland a caída libre y forzada del martillo, un diseño estadístico completamente aleatorizado con diez repeticiones y cuatro tratamientos, Análisis de Varianza, Mínima Diferencia Significativa y regresión polinómica. Se concluyó que el Uhland produjo resultados similares al Proctor. La energía penetrante del Uhland resultó superior a la compactante del Proctor. La humedad del suelo influyó sobre la densidad aparente seca. La relación de solidez y la porosidad aerífera identificaron mejor el proceso | es_MX |
dc.language.iso | spa | es_MX |
dc.publisher | Universidad de Guanajuato | es_MX |
dc.relation | https://doi.org/10.15174/au.2013.427 | - |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_MX |
dc.source | Acta Universitaria: Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal. Vol. 23 Num 3 (2013) | es_MX |
dc.title | Valoración física comparativa del muestreador Uhland y el Proctor en un suelo franco arenoso de sabana del estado Monagas, Venezuela | es_MX |
dc.title.alternative | Comparative physical evaluation of Uhland and Proctor samplers on a sandy savanna soil in the state of Monagas in Venezuela | en |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_MX |
dc.subject.cti | info:eu-repo/classification/cti/1 | es_MX |
dc.subject.keywords | Energía | es_MX |
dc.subject.keywords | Compactación relativa | es_MX |
dc.subject.keywords | Solidez | es_MX |
dc.subject.keywords | Porosidad. | es_MX |
dc.subject.keywords | Energy | en |
dc.subject.keywords | Relative compaction | en |
dc.subject.keywords | Solidity | en |
dc.subject.keywords | Porosity. | en |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_MX |
dc.creator.two | Omar Guerra | - |
dc.creator.idtwo | info:eu-repo/dai/mx/orcid/0000-0002-7302-7664 | es_MX |
dc.description.abstractEnglish | It is common to obtain agricultural soil samples using the Uhland sampler. The critical index of soil compaction is obtained with the Proctor test. The objective of this work was to perform a physical comparison between the Uhland sampler, with free and forced fall of the hammer, and the Proctor apparatus to assess mechanical alterations of the sample. Standard and modified Proctor instruments were used, as well as the Uhland with free and forced hammer fall. A completely randomized statistical design with ten replicates and four treatments was performed along with the analysis of variance, Minimum Significant Difference and polynomial regression. It was concluded that Uhland and Proctor instruments produced similar results. The penetrating energy of the Uhland was higher than the compacting energy of the Proctor. Humidity in the soil had an influence of the apparent dry density. The solidity ratio of the soil and the air porosity were the parameters that best identified the compaction process for the Proctor and Uhland instruments | en |
Appears in Collections: | Revista Acta Universitaria |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Valoración física comparativa del muestreador Uhland y el Proctor en un suelo franco arenoso de sabana del estado Monagas, Venezuela.pdf | 1.36 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.